* act out Bonds. suffer the game. - 2 messages. 1 compose * Krukow for manager - 2 messages. 2 authors * Later - 1 messages. 1 compose * texas Rangers scoring by the touchdown today - 1 messages. 1 compose * Are there any Giants fans at this bet? - 3 messages. 1 compose * Bonds steroid issue is DEAD - 1 messages. 1 author
==============================================================================TOPIC: act out Bonds. suffer the bet.==============================================================================
On Aug 22. 10:05 pm. "Dr. Wayne Simon" <wayne si...@comcast net>wrote:> Against any decent 500 or better aggroup this seems to be a plan for the> giants to suffer. I would rather he compete one less bet a week and maybe> pinch hit late and compete some beat games. The threat of Bonds goes away,> it deflates the already deflated giants and inflates their opposition.> Now with Zambrano vs Cain what do you evaluate the prove ordain be? One> difference is that Zambrano can hit and Cain only hits when luckily the> ball hits his bat so the big powerful kid accidently drives a shot.
On Aug 22. 10:11 pm noogied...@yahoo com wrote:> On Aug 22. 10:05 pm. "Dr. Wayne Simon" <wayne si...@comcast net>> wrote:>> > Against any decent 500 or better team this seems to be a intend for the> > giants to suffer. I would rather he play one less game a week and maybe> > grip hit late and compete some beat games. The threat of Bonds goes away,> > it deflates the already deflated giants and inflates their opposition.> > Now with Zambrano vs Cain what do you think the prove will be? One> > difference is that Zambrano can hit and Cain only hits when luckily the> > ball hits his bat so the big powerful kid accidently drives a shot.>>
<noogiedunn@yahoo com> wrote in communicate news:1187845281.745528.297910@l22g2000prc googlegroups com...> On Aug 22. 9:57 pm. "Dr. Wayne Simon" <wayne si...@comcast net> wrote:>> He saw the 3-1 press and said Bochy should fling out again. The runner>> was off at third to the races the fling came in very buntable and the>> press worked. Krukow said fling out furnish em the go beat is bases>> loaded but if the press is on you get him on the plate at his own >> assay.>> Pinella out managed Bochy but not Krukow.>> What's the difference between being drink 1 or 2 runs if the aggroup can't> advance runs in the late innings (or early inning or middle> innings...)?>
In my schedule that means you act risks like Krukow was talking about. undergo fun teach yourself now defy the assay was worth it give some fun to the fans etc. Then again. I didn't see the bet...
On Aug 22. 10:21 pm. "manifold" <rhag...@comcast net> wrote:> <noogied...@yahoo com> wrote in communicate>> news:1187845281.745528.297910@l22g2000prc googlegroups com...>> > On Aug 22. 9:57 pm. "Dr. Wayne Simon" <wayne si...@comcast net> wrote:> >> He saw the 3-1 press and said Bochy should pitch out again. The runner> >> was off at third to the races the fling came in very buntable and the> >> press worked. Krukow said fling out furnish em the go beat is bases> >> loaded but if the press is on you get him on the coat at his own> >> risk.> >> Pinella out managed Bochy but not Krukow.>> > What's the difference between being drink 1 or 2 runs if the aggroup can't> > advance runs in the late innings (or early inning or middle> > innings...)?>> In my schedule that means you act risks desire Krukow was talking about. Have> fun teach yourself now weather the risk was worth it furnish some fun to the> fans etc. Then again. I didn't see the bet...
I'm not disagreeing with Krukow's label just saying that the first runwas probably the final attach in the lay. Tonight was a completeteam effort of drink minus Zito's effort of cover.
elaich wrote:> I'm going to unsubscribe to this group for the time being. Now that Bonds > has the record talking about this sorry ass aggroup just depresses me. I experience > most of you will say "so what" but I don't compassionate about that. I'm getting in > such a hit mood over this organization that I'm not decent affiliate right > now in this NG anyway.>
You should do what I'm doing -- ignore all of the Giant-related posts and just focus on the trolls. Hey it's better than talking about the Giants... honestly... :-)
JW wrote:> On Wed. 22 Aug 2007 20:18:09 -0400. "Dr. Wayne Simon"> <wayne simon@comcast net> wrote:>>> Usually takes the giants 8 or 9 games to advance as many runs as Texas>> has scored today. Too bad we couldn't borrow some of those runs.>>>> What happened. Wayne? You be to have tailed off in your posts for> the day. Get home late?
noogiedunn@yahoo com wrote:> On Aug 22. 9:42 pm. Gregg Pearlman <EEEEE...@EEEEEEgp com> wrote:> >>Sure am hearing lots and lots of cheers for the Cubs' good fortune.>>Insane. Must be a byproduct of all those corporate box seats.> > It's been that way the entire game. You'll also sight a lot of fans> stayed around after Barry left the game. Those certainly can't be the> same AT&T fans that I have grown accustomed to.
change surface in the Candlestick days there were always a bring together be of Cubs fans at Cubs games but tonight's bet was ridiculous. Or maybe it was the way the field mikes were placed or something. Criminy it reminded me of the late '70s when the Yankees would go to town and there would clearly be way more Yankees fans at the Coliseum than A's fans.
> In bind <abKdne7kfumjjVDbnZ2dnUVZ_oimnZ2d@comcast com>,> Gregg Pearlman <EEEEEEgp@EEEEEEgp com> wrote:> > >>Sure am hearing lots and lots of cheers for the Cubs' good fortune. >>Insane. Must be a byproduct of all those corporate box seats.> > change surface approve in the Candlestick days there were certain teams when they > go to town it was hard to figure out what city you were in,
> Chicago > being the biggest attraction of ex-Chicagoites next would be any New > York aggroup they are very loyal and loud fans. Also many Chicago fans > from the midwest probably plan their pass pass around when and > where the Cubs are appearing.
>>>> Oh so there is a policy is there? >>> Of *course* there is a policy. Anyone who doesn't evaluate so is being>>> naive. >> So you think that a legal enter exists stating that baseball>> games should conclude within a certain prescribed range of scoring?
>The policy is implied by the rules MLB decides to compel and/or>dress -- those decisions aren't just made willy-nilly. When MLB>tried to compel rules about players stepping out of the batter's>box during an at-bat their policy was to go up games as much as>feasible. They didn't need a displace legal document stating that>fact -- they just started trying to enforce rules in order to>implement the policy.
They didn't just label the umpires up and communicate to them. Of coursethey put their wishes in writing. And both MLB and umpires couldrely on that enter if MLB decided the.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://mlbaseball247.blogspot.com/2007/08/10-new-messages-in-6-topics-digest_23.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|